In the summer of 1944, German and fascist forces conducted many operations across Northern Italy. The sweeps and armed security-patrols into the rugged mountains were designed to break up the growing partisan companies and restrict their ability to operate.
Many of the rule book missions could be used to re-fight aspects of a security operation. But I want to create a mission where partisans are making a desperate bid to break through a security cordon to escape. With this in mind I played a couple of solo games to get a feel for how squads might interact on wooded table, with one side attempting to exit and the other to stop them.

I went with infantry heavy forces with around 450 to 500 points. A bit smaller than even a small game, but large enough to try out some ideas. For the partisans I tried one game with a small number of squads and another with the same number of fighters, but split into groups of 3 to 5.

I opposed the partisans with a more structured German force: several 5 man squads with rifles, a medium mortar, a 3 man LMG squad, and an officer. Thematically, I think matching the partisans against an inexperienced or green security force could be a lot of fun, but for this experiment I went with regular squads.

In the first game I deployed the partisans randomly, using the paratroop drop rules from Market Garden. Then the Germans entered the board from random board edges. The double randomness was too much and would likely lead to very swingy games- even more swingy than BA is usually!

For the second game I dialed back the random deployment. The Germans deployed up to half of their units on the board, but their reserves came on randomly in from turn 2. The partisans started off board, with at least half coming on as first wave.

The dynamic of using squads of 3 to 5 was interesting. It gave the partisans plenty of dice, but limited fire power, and forced moral checks more frequently. Another idea might be forcing the fleeing partisans to start with 0 to 2 pins on each squad.

I need to sort out scoring yet, and I think the points need to be balanced a bit. A higher number of points for the partisans, perhaps 50% more might even the sides up a bit, given the partisans need to advance into the Axis deployment zone and move off the board in order to win.
Also victory points need to be worked out. I think something like 2 victory points per exited unit for the partisans and 1 victory point per partisan squad eliminated by the Axis force.
More experiments are clearly required.
Sounds like an interesting project to work on! 🙂 You could maybe start with fewer Germans initially and see how that goes.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I did try that version, where the Germans are initially limited and only build up in a potentially uncertain way. I think this will work the best
LikeLiked by 3 people
Sounds like you’re working through this pretty methodically! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Great work Dave. I liked the way you applied the lessons from the previous game to the next. This is the ideal type of stuff for solo gaming where the game is less important than working out the scenario. A good lesson for us all. Thanks.
LikeLiked by 3 people
thanks Guru.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Looks good. I like your solo approach to develop the scenario. I will have to try it too.
Cheers,
Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
there is no hesitation to rewind and try something else to see what happens, it can be a fun way to give shape to an idea.
LikeLiked by 1 person